• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mustang evolution
#1
I saw this on MSN this morning. Lots of factual and grammatical errors. It reads like it was written by a 6th grader for a book report, but still worth a look.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/autos-sp...ailsignout

Steve
  Reply
#2
I made it to the third page before I called it quits. I almost called it quits on the second page when the engine sizes were shown in liters (metric). Now let me say that I have nothing against metrics, I like metrics, actually prefer it over inches and feet. Way back when the U.S. was thinking about transitioning to the metric system I was certified (by Federal Highway Administration) as an instructor for teaching DOT personnel how the metric system was better. I was even able to convince most of the old hard-headed maintainers Smile

When I got to the third page and the writer said "a 4.7-liter V8" I knew the writer knew nothing about cars, Mustangs in particular. That's about as bad as saying "a" 351 engine. What about carburetor sizes, what about high-performance solid lifter?



“If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.”
--Albert Einstein
  Reply
#3
I quit at the 4th word.

The Mustang didn't debuted in "1964".

[/url][Image: mbpsrsig3_zps456db2cb.png]

[url=http://s165.photobucket.com/user/MPBsr25/media/mbpsrsig3_zps456db2cb.png.html]
  Reply
#4
(10-07-2018, 08:39 AM)mpbsr Wrote: I quit at the 4th word.

The Mustang didn't debuted in "1964".

It most certainly did: April 17, 1964 was the introduction of the Mustang, and the first day to be able to order one.

Let me check your shorts!
http://midlifeharness.com

[Image: Flamicon2.jpg]


[Image: oldfart.png]
  Reply
#5
LOL, where were you in 1964 I kept the news paper ad just cannot find it in all the stuff I have. Lee Holman actually got to driving his 1964 1/2 Mustang before it was released by Ford. He got stopped multiple times just to look. Having a dad that built all of Fords performance vehicles had it's advantages.
I have a Mustang hood with a March 1964 date code. So it is good for any early vehicle.


When a man is in the woods and talks and no women are there is he still wrong??
Tongue
David
  Reply
#6
I think he was referring to "debuted". Chuck
  Reply
#7
(10-07-2018, 05:11 PM)c9zx Wrote: I think he was referring to "debuted". Chuck

Doh!  I missed that.  They probably meant Debutante!

Let me check your shorts!
http://midlifeharness.com

[Image: Flamicon2.jpg]


[Image: oldfart.png]
  Reply
Share Thread:  


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Abandoned Mustang in Midwest City, OK Boss1Ray 2 278 02-04-2019, 12:12 PM
Last Post: Boss1Ray
  1972 Mustang functional Ram Air Boss1Ray 14 3,061 02-01-2019, 11:40 AM
Last Post: mreddie72
  Mustang Memories 2019 Car Show Stanglover 21 510 12-24-2018, 03:01 PM
Last Post: jpaz
  American Muscle 1971 Ford Mustang Mach 1 (Hemmings Muscle Machines) 1:18 Scale Diecas mustang7173 4 557 12-22-2018, 08:29 AM
Last Post: 72MustangSprint
  Mustang 360 71-73 Spotter's Guide Bill73Ragtop 14 606 12-18-2018, 01:48 PM
Last Post: secluff
  Japanese Mustang thread on hagerty.com mwilson7 2 273 12-10-2018, 09:22 AM
Last Post: 73pony
  72 made Mustang Monthly 360 at MCACN bkdunha 6 396 12-09-2018, 01:57 PM
Last Post: 72MustangSprint
  73 Mustang Vacuum diagram, with ac 71steed 6 350 11-08-2018, 01:24 PM
Last Post: Don C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)