• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Justin's 1973 Mach 1 "Q" Code
#11
Looks like a nice car to start with, good luck on the build, looking forward to the progress. Ryan

1973 Mach 1, Porsche Guards Red, 429/C6
1972 Mach 1, Grabber Blue, 302/C4, currently under construction
  Reply
#12
I am considering stroking the Cleveland to 408 CI with a Scat rotating assembly. I would like the engine to make more torque down low in the powerband. The compression will be around 9:1-9.3:1 depending on deck height and completed combustion chamber size. I think I found the cam kit too. It is a Comp Cam Magnum hydraulic roller with 224 duration and 566 lift. I am not settled on the induction yet whether we stay factory or go aftermarket.
  Reply
#13
(04-06-2017, 11:21 AM)wrobinson Wrote: I am considering stroking the Cleveland to 408 CI with a Scat rotating assembly. I would like the engine to make more torque down low in the powerband. The compression will be around 9:1-9.3:1 depending on deck height and completed combustion chamber size. I think I found the cam kit too. It is  a Comp Cam Magnum hydraulic roller with 224 duration and 566 lift. I am not settled on the induction yet whether we stay factory or go aftermarket.

I would stray away from the comp cams Hydraulic roller set up....... I have had nothing but trouble with my comp roller lifters in my 408.  3 collapsed so far.  Still fighting with them over it.  junk junk!

Kevin

1971 Mach 1
408C Stroker
C4 w/3,000 stall
8.8" Rear w/3.73's
Disc brakes all way around.

https://youtu.be/SoW1fhaFPzY  Burn Out Video. 

[Image: 044.jpg]
  Reply
#14
(04-06-2017, 11:25 AM)turtle5353 Wrote:
(04-06-2017, 11:21 AM)wrobinson Wrote: I am considering stroking the Cleveland to 408 CI with a Scat rotating assembly. I would like the engine to make more torque down low in the powerband. The compression will be around 9:1-9.3:1 depending on deck height and completed combustion chamber size. I think I found the cam kit too. It is  a Comp Cam Magnum hydraulic roller with 224 duration and 566 lift. I am not settled on the induction yet whether we stay factory or go aftermarket.

I would stray away from the comp cams Hydraulic roller set up....... I have had nothing but trouble with my comp roller lifters in my 408.  3 collapsed so far.  Still fighting with them over it.  junk junk!

Dang man that sucks! I have always liked Comp's stuff. I think the problem is everything now is Chinese junk.
  Reply
#15
(04-06-2017, 11:36 AM)wrobinson Wrote:
(04-06-2017, 11:25 AM)turtle5353 Wrote:
(04-06-2017, 11:21 AM)wrobinson Wrote: I am considering stroking the Cleveland to 408 CI with a Scat rotating assembly. I would like the engine to make more torque down low in the powerband. The compression will be around 9:1-9.3:1 depending on deck height and completed combustion chamber size. I think I found the cam kit too. It is  a Comp Cam Magnum hydraulic roller with 224 duration and 566 lift. I am not settled on the induction yet whether we stay factory or go aftermarket.

I would stray away from the comp cams Hydraulic roller set up....... I have had nothing but trouble with my comp roller lifters in my 408.  3 collapsed so far.  Still fighting with them over it.  junk junk!

Dang man that sucks! I have always liked Comp's stuff. I think the problem is everything now is Chinese junk.

Not everything but most!!

Kevin

1971 Mach 1
408C Stroker
C4 w/3,000 stall
8.8" Rear w/3.73's
Disc brakes all way around.

https://youtu.be/SoW1fhaFPzY  Burn Out Video. 

[Image: 044.jpg]
  Reply
#16
In my spare time I performed a compression check on the engine. Multiple cylinders with zero compression was not promising for a motor that was supposed to be rebuilt. I decided that I would tear it down to figure out the problem. I am pretty sure the problem is the heads. It looks like the motor has been rebuilt with new slugs in every hole. It looks as if the heads received no attention. I will completely tear the motor apart and rehone the cylinders, check line bore, lifter bore alignment, and bearing clearances.


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
                           
  Reply
#17
The heads will get a complete rebuild with Ferrara valves, new valve train, bronze guides, and 3 angle valve. Thinking about some new pedestal roller rockers by Scorpion and chromoly push rods as well. It looks like the lifters are new. As soon as I finish pulling the balancer and front timing cover I will see about the timing chain and camshaft. So far it looks like someone actually used decent components on the build.
  Reply
#18
New forged pistons!!
  Reply
#19
Wow those heads are terrible looking. I don't think they ever fired it after they rebuilt the bottom end, if they rebuilt anything.
  Reply
#20
(12-21-2016, 12:55 PM)wrobinson Wrote: I ordered the Deluxe Marti Report today. I think the Ivy Glow paint and Avocado interior might be somewhat unique but we will see. Ivy Glow/C4 paint was new for 1973. I guess we will wait and see.

No you do not have to wait. I looked it up and according to Marti's book Mustang by the numbers I can tell you the following. Your color 4C is Ivy Bronze Metallic and the interior code of GG is only in the Mach 1 Sports Interior and they made 693 of them. You can find the books on Mart's web site or look on Amazon.


When a man is in the woods and talks and no women are there is he still wrong??
Tongue
David
  Reply
Share Thread:  


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  1973 "Pro-Touring" project - Creator protouringstang73 566 54,962 01-19-2020, 11:24 AM
Last Post: protouringstang73
  Photos of Marti for 1973 Mach 1 one owner Carolina_Mountain_Mustangs 7 407 01-12-2020, 05:40 AM
Last Post: jarzap
  71 Grabber Green Metallic M code convertible Richard Verco 31 1,793 01-07-2020, 11:19 PM
Last Post: mach71351c
  My 1973 Grandé A.Nilsson 12 364 12-30-2019, 02:22 PM
Last Post: RC92234
  '73 Q code 'vert build thread RC92234 12 549 12-27-2019, 06:40 PM
Last Post: jpaz



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)