• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
It’s back! 71 Mach 1
#1
The gentlemen I painted the mustang for last winter has brought it back for a little more work. Nothing too crazy. I will have to repair 2 dents in the hood and a scratch. Also wants me to install a petronix kit in his original dizzy. Check front turn signals. Get horn working properly. And fix a squeaky belt.  Overall the car looks great!  


[Image: D2016269_C47_F_4508_A3_DA_2_A05_AC9_C1_CC8.jpg]

[Image: D36815_A4_BA3_D_4_FA6_B556_5204_C8_ADA36_B.jpg]

Kevin

1971 Mach 1
408C Stroker
C4 w/3,000 stall
8.8" Rear w/3.73's
Disc brakes all way around.

[Image: 28ivsix.png]




                                                                                             
[+] 2 users Like turtle5353's post
  Reply
#2
That's exactly how my car looked from the factory. M code 351C 4 barrel 4 speed nothing else.
  Reply
#3
It does look really good
  Reply
#4
(03-20-2018, 08:28 AM)Tnfastbk Wrote: That's exactly how my car looked from the factory. M code 351C 4 barrel 4 speed nothing else.

 Mine too, a 1 of 6 in Light Pewter. No ps, pb, drums on all 4 corners, am radio, basic 1A interior and nothing else either........... BUT a PO added the black-out and side stripes as well as Magnum 500 wheels. I retained all of that when it was repainted as that is what a Mach 1 should  have looked like from the factory in my humble opinion.
  Reply
#5
(03-20-2018, 06:39 AM)turtle5353 Wrote: The gentlemen I painted the mustang for last winter has brought it back for a little more work. Nothing too crazy. I will have to repair 2 dents in the hood and a scratch. Also wants me to install a petronix kit in his original dizzy. Check front turn signals. Get horn working properly. And fix a squeaky belt.  Overall the car looks great!  

 On the Pertronix ignition kit, my strong suggestion would be to use the Pertronix Ignitor II and the matching Flamethrower coil. You probably have read past post from me on this and the issues I had with the Ignitor III. Pertronix took back the Ignitor III and replaced it with the above. This of course is unless they have recently redesigned the stupid plastic "bearing" they had between the two plates. If that is the case, then the Ignitor III has excellent electronics. It was just a shame that this bearing thing on the Ford application was so badly constructed.
Just from my experience and my 2 cents worth
The car looks great though and just like mine was from the factory.
Geoff.
  Reply
#6
(03-20-2018, 12:15 PM)Stanglover Wrote:
(03-20-2018, 06:39 AM)turtle5353 Wrote: The gentlemen I painted the mustang for last winter has brought it back for a little more work. Nothing too crazy. I will have to repair 2 dents in the hood and a scratch. Also wants me to install a petronix kit in his original dizzy. Check front turn signals. Get horn working properly. And fix a squeaky belt.  Overall the car looks great!  

 On the Pertronix ignition kit, my strong suggestion would be to use the Pertronix Ignitor II and the matching Flamethrower coil. You probably have read past post from me on this and the issues I had with the Ignitor III. Pertronix took back the Ignitor III and replaced it with the above. This of course is unless they have recently redesigned the stupid plastic "bearing" they had between the two plates. If that is the case, then the Ignitor III has excellent electronics. It was just a shame that this bearing thing on the Ford application was so badly constructed.
Just from my experience and my 2 cents worth
The car looks great though and just like mine was from the factory.
Geoff.
Thanks Geoff!
I installed the pertonix kit last night. Took all about 10 minutes. Its the original Petronix 1.  Very simple and easy to install.  Hooked the 2 wires up to the coil, hit the key and she purred like a kitten.

Kevin

1971 Mach 1
408C Stroker
C4 w/3,000 stall
8.8" Rear w/3.73's
Disc brakes all way around.

[Image: 28ivsix.png]




                                                                                             
  Reply
#7
Thanks for the replies fellas.  This car is really cool and very original. Matching numbers everything .  Original interior, except steering wheel.  Power disc brakes. AC. Standard interior.  dog dish hubcaps on 14's.  351 -2v with a 3 speed manual.

Kevin

1971 Mach 1
408C Stroker
C4 w/3,000 stall
8.8" Rear w/3.73's
Disc brakes all way around.

[Image: 28ivsix.png]




                                                                                             
  Reply
#8
(03-21-2018, 07:13 AM)turtle5353 Wrote: Thanks for the replies fellas.  This car is really cool and very original. Matching numbers everything .  Original interior, except steering wheel.  Power disc brakes. AC. Standard interior.  dog dish hubcaps on 14's.  351 -2v with a 3 speed manual.

Little nicer than when I found mine.
[Image: 1204081649_Large.jpg]
  Reply
#9
(03-21-2018, 07:10 AM)turtle5353 Wrote:
(03-20-2018, 12:15 PM)Stanglover Wrote:
(03-20-2018, 06:39 AM)turtle5353 Wrote: The gentlemen I painted the mustang for last winter has brought it back for a little more work. Nothing too crazy. I will have to repair 2 dents in the hood and a scratch. Also wants me to install a petronix kit in his original dizzy. Check front turn signals. Get horn working properly. And fix a squeaky belt.  Overall the car looks great!  

 On the Pertronix ignition kit, my strong suggestion would be to use the Pertronix Ignitor II and the matching Flamethrower coil. You probably have read past post from me on this and the issues I had with the Ignitor III. Pertronix took back the Ignitor III and replaced it with the above. This of course is unless they have recently redesigned the stupid plastic "bearing" they had between the two plates. If that is the case, then the Ignitor III has excellent electronics. It was just a shame that this bearing thing on the Ford application was so badly constructed.
Just from my experience and my 2 cents worth
The car looks great though and just like mine was from the factory.
Geoff.
Thanks Geoff!
I installed the pertonix kit last night. Took all about 10 minutes. Its the original Petronix 1.  Very simple and easy to install.  Hooked the 2 wires up to the coil, hit the key and she purred like a kitten.
 That's great news. The P 1 is the simplest as it can run on resisted voltage or so they tell me. Why anyone wants to keep points is beyond me unless it's a concours trailer queen and needed for judging.
Geoff.
  Reply
#10
(03-21-2018, 08:33 AM)Tnfastbk Wrote:
(03-21-2018, 07:13 AM)turtle5353 Wrote: Thanks for the replies fellas.  This car is really cool and very original. Matching numbers everything .  Original interior, except steering wheel.  Power disc brakes. AC. Standard interior.  dog dish hubcaps on 14's.  351 -2v with a 3 speed manual.

Little nicer than when I found mine.
[Image: 1204081649_Large.jpg]

Yeah Roy, this one was pretty solid to start with but did have a lot of unseen rust. Heres a link to the build from last year if you missed it!

https://www.7173mustangs.com/thread-new-...-71-mach-1

Kevin

1971 Mach 1
408C Stroker
C4 w/3,000 stall
8.8" Rear w/3.73's
Disc brakes all way around.

[Image: 28ivsix.png]




                                                                                             
  Reply
Share Thread:  


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  1973 Mach 1 in upcoming movie Boss1Ray 5 204 10 hours ago
Last Post: OLE PONY
  Pics of my 73 Q code Mach 1 CJ MACH 1 6 233 05-18-2019, 06:59 PM
Last Post: Boss1Ray
  Still searching Mach 1 Machvince 53 2,643 05-17-2019, 06:48 AM
Last Post: Machvince
  1972 Mach 1 interior question classicsguy 8 304 05-11-2019, 07:46 AM
Last Post: OMS
  1971 & 1972 Mach 1's running incorrect front bumpers Boss1Ray 29 1,881 04-25-2019, 07:44 AM
Last Post: jpaz
  So according to the Hagerty sales rep, my '73 Mexican mach 1 is worth MustangNJ 14 470 04-24-2019, 12:40 PM
Last Post: detritusmaximus
  I'm almost certain I just bought a Mexican Mach 1 MustangNJ 31 1,036 04-22-2019, 09:30 AM
Last Post: MustangNJ
  What horn button is correct for 73 mach 1? MustangNJ 8 284 04-15-2019, 06:19 PM
Last Post: mudbilly



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)