• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
It’s back! 71 Mach 1
#1
The gentlemen I painted the mustang for last winter has brought it back for a little more work. Nothing too crazy. I will have to repair 2 dents in the hood and a scratch. Also wants me to install a petronix kit in his original dizzy. Check front turn signals. Get horn working properly. And fix a squeaky belt.  Overall the car looks great!  


[Image: D2016269_C47_F_4508_A3_DA_2_A05_AC9_C1_CC8.jpg]

[Image: D36815_A4_BA3_D_4_FA6_B556_5204_C8_ADA36_B.jpg]

Kevin

1971 Mach 1
408C Stroker
C4 w/3,000 stall
8.8" Rear w/3.73's
Disc brakes all way around.

[Image: 28ivsix.png]




                                                                                             
[+] 2 users Like turtle5353's post
  Reply
#2
That's exactly how my car looked from the factory. M code 351C 4 barrel 4 speed nothing else.
  Reply
#3
It does look really good
  Reply
#4
(03-20-2018, 08:28 AM)Tnfastbk Wrote: That's exactly how my car looked from the factory. M code 351C 4 barrel 4 speed nothing else.

 Mine too, a 1 of 6 in Light Pewter. No ps, pb, drums on all 4 corners, am radio, basic 1A interior and nothing else either........... BUT a PO added the black-out and side stripes as well as Magnum 500 wheels. I retained all of that when it was repainted as that is what a Mach 1 should  have looked like from the factory in my humble opinion.
  Reply
#5
(03-20-2018, 06:39 AM)turtle5353 Wrote: The gentlemen I painted the mustang for last winter has brought it back for a little more work. Nothing too crazy. I will have to repair 2 dents in the hood and a scratch. Also wants me to install a petronix kit in his original dizzy. Check front turn signals. Get horn working properly. And fix a squeaky belt.  Overall the car looks great!  

 On the Pertronix ignition kit, my strong suggestion would be to use the Pertronix Ignitor II and the matching Flamethrower coil. You probably have read past post from me on this and the issues I had with the Ignitor III. Pertronix took back the Ignitor III and replaced it with the above. This of course is unless they have recently redesigned the stupid plastic "bearing" they had between the two plates. If that is the case, then the Ignitor III has excellent electronics. It was just a shame that this bearing thing on the Ford application was so badly constructed.
Just from my experience and my 2 cents worth
The car looks great though and just like mine was from the factory.
Geoff.
  Reply
#6
(03-20-2018, 12:15 PM)Stanglover Wrote:
(03-20-2018, 06:39 AM)turtle5353 Wrote: The gentlemen I painted the mustang for last winter has brought it back for a little more work. Nothing too crazy. I will have to repair 2 dents in the hood and a scratch. Also wants me to install a petronix kit in his original dizzy. Check front turn signals. Get horn working properly. And fix a squeaky belt.  Overall the car looks great!  

 On the Pertronix ignition kit, my strong suggestion would be to use the Pertronix Ignitor II and the matching Flamethrower coil. You probably have read past post from me on this and the issues I had with the Ignitor III. Pertronix took back the Ignitor III and replaced it with the above. This of course is unless they have recently redesigned the stupid plastic "bearing" they had between the two plates. If that is the case, then the Ignitor III has excellent electronics. It was just a shame that this bearing thing on the Ford application was so badly constructed.
Just from my experience and my 2 cents worth
The car looks great though and just like mine was from the factory.
Geoff.
Thanks Geoff!
I installed the pertonix kit last night. Took all about 10 minutes. Its the original Petronix 1.  Very simple and easy to install.  Hooked the 2 wires up to the coil, hit the key and she purred like a kitten.

Kevin

1971 Mach 1
408C Stroker
C4 w/3,000 stall
8.8" Rear w/3.73's
Disc brakes all way around.

[Image: 28ivsix.png]




                                                                                             
  Reply
#7
Thanks for the replies fellas.  This car is really cool and very original. Matching numbers everything .  Original interior, except steering wheel.  Power disc brakes. AC. Standard interior.  dog dish hubcaps on 14's.  351 -2v with a 3 speed manual.

Kevin

1971 Mach 1
408C Stroker
C4 w/3,000 stall
8.8" Rear w/3.73's
Disc brakes all way around.

[Image: 28ivsix.png]




                                                                                             
  Reply
#8
(03-21-2018, 07:13 AM)turtle5353 Wrote: Thanks for the replies fellas.  This car is really cool and very original. Matching numbers everything .  Original interior, except steering wheel.  Power disc brakes. AC. Standard interior.  dog dish hubcaps on 14's.  351 -2v with a 3 speed manual.

Little nicer than when I found mine.
[Image: 1204081649_Large.jpg]
  Reply
#9
(03-21-2018, 07:10 AM)turtle5353 Wrote:
(03-20-2018, 12:15 PM)Stanglover Wrote:
(03-20-2018, 06:39 AM)turtle5353 Wrote: The gentlemen I painted the mustang for last winter has brought it back for a little more work. Nothing too crazy. I will have to repair 2 dents in the hood and a scratch. Also wants me to install a petronix kit in his original dizzy. Check front turn signals. Get horn working properly. And fix a squeaky belt.  Overall the car looks great!  

 On the Pertronix ignition kit, my strong suggestion would be to use the Pertronix Ignitor II and the matching Flamethrower coil. You probably have read past post from me on this and the issues I had with the Ignitor III. Pertronix took back the Ignitor III and replaced it with the above. This of course is unless they have recently redesigned the stupid plastic "bearing" they had between the two plates. If that is the case, then the Ignitor III has excellent electronics. It was just a shame that this bearing thing on the Ford application was so badly constructed.
Just from my experience and my 2 cents worth
The car looks great though and just like mine was from the factory.
Geoff.
Thanks Geoff!
I installed the pertonix kit last night. Took all about 10 minutes. Its the original Petronix 1.  Very simple and easy to install.  Hooked the 2 wires up to the coil, hit the key and she purred like a kitten.
 That's great news. The P 1 is the simplest as it can run on resisted voltage or so they tell me. Why anyone wants to keep points is beyond me unless it's a concours trailer queen and needed for judging.
Geoff.
  Reply
#10
(03-21-2018, 08:33 AM)Tnfastbk Wrote:
(03-21-2018, 07:13 AM)turtle5353 Wrote: Thanks for the replies fellas.  This car is really cool and very original. Matching numbers everything .  Original interior, except steering wheel.  Power disc brakes. AC. Standard interior.  dog dish hubcaps on 14's.  351 -2v with a 3 speed manual.

Little nicer than when I found mine.
[Image: 1204081649_Large.jpg]

Yeah Roy, this one was pretty solid to start with but did have a lot of unseen rust. Heres a link to the build from last year if you missed it!

https://www.7173mustangs.com/thread-new-...-71-mach-1

Kevin

1971 Mach 1
408C Stroker
C4 w/3,000 stall
8.8" Rear w/3.73's
Disc brakes all way around.

[Image: 28ivsix.png]




                                                                                             
  Reply
Share Thread:  


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  TV sighting 71 or 72 Mach 1 Boss1Ray 2 186 12-11-2018, 11:58 AM
Last Post: Boss1Ray
  Build Plans for 73 Mach 1, input requested wdills 21 558 12-03-2018, 05:01 PM
Last Post: Mister 4x4
  Still searching Mach 1 Machvince 50 1,804 11-27-2018, 04:46 AM
Last Post: Machvince
  1973 Mach 1 stripe classicsguy 4 330 11-20-2018, 09:18 AM
Last Post: jowens1126
  American Muscle 1971 Ford Mustang Mach 1 (Hemmings Muscle Machines) 1:18 Scale Diecas mustang7173 0 229 11-05-2018, 08:56 AM
Last Post: mustang7173
  1971 429 Mach 1 video OzCoupe72 5 393 10-02-2018, 05:18 PM
Last Post: 7173Vert
  trade the 72 Mach for a 69 Mach???? scgamecock 12 531 09-25-2018, 04:47 PM
Last Post: computercarguy
  Barnfind 1971 Mach 1 Boss1Ray 6 613 09-17-2018, 02:16 PM
Last Post: Carolina_Mountain_Mustangs



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)