• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
I had to share this
#11
I think its pretty cool. Took some work to get it in there. And it don't look like he hacked it all up doing it. Front end has to be awfully heavy though!!! But its something different. I would drive it!

Kevin

1971 Mach 1
408C Stroker
C4 w/3,000 stall
8.8" Rear w/3.73's
Disc brakes all way around.

[Image: 28ivsix.png]




                                                                                             
  Reply
#12
PeglegI will be glad when all new cars are gas or electric/hybrid engines. There is nothing worse than sitting behind a old diesel engine in traffic. Toxic gases and a vile smell

How many people are sitting behind your Grandé wishing they would get rid of those old cars dumping out raw toxic gases and a vile smells rofl Big Grin Chin rofl rofl rofl
  Reply
#13
LOL..............yea, I always wonder people think when I pass a Volt or SmartCar

73 ragtop, 1999 Mustang Bright Atlantic Blue Paint, Phoenix Engine 302-335HP,  Edelbrock Carb & Performer manifold; c4 with 2000 stall and shiftkit; 3:55 auburn limited slip differential, Hedman shorties; Car Chemistry Exhaust

Classic Air; Tilt Steering Wheel; 1999 Chrysler Sebring bucket Seats ; power windows;
  Reply
#14
How many people stand behind me wishing I would quit dumping out toxic gases and vile smells. Smile

73 Grandé H Code. Headman long tube headers, T-5 Transmission, 3.70 Traclok, Lowered 1" all around, Aussie 2v heads w/ 2.19 intake, 1.71 exhaust, screw in studs, full roller cam 608/612 lift 280/281 duration LSA 112, Quick Fuel 750 CFM double pumper, AirGap intake.

- Jason


[Image: 082-hot-rod-power-tour-2017-1970-1970s.jpg]
  Reply
#15
(07-25-2018, 08:33 AM)73pony Wrote: How many people stand behind me wishing I would quit dumping out toxic gases and vile smells. Smile
goodone
That'll teach them to not get so close to your back end.



“If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.”
--Albert Einstein
  Reply
#16
Cool engineering.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

        [Image: 20160929_171923_edit2_small.jpg]

1971 M-Code Mach 1 w/Ram Air, 408 stroker, 285/291 0.558" roller cam, Blue Thunder intake, TKO600, Hooker headers with electric cut-offs, FiTech EFI w/ RobBMC PowerSurge pump
Strange center section with Truetrac, 3.5 gear and 31 spline axles, 4-wheel disc brakes
  Reply
#17
From what I can find online, the Cummings 3.3 engine is made primarily for industrial use, fork lifts, etc., is heavy duty and heavy.

My wife and I had a small motorhome (24') that was on a Mercedes chassis and had a 3.0L V6 turbocharged diesel engine with a 5-speed automatic transmission. It wouldn't have made a bad choice for someone wanting to convert to a diesel, moved the 9,000 lb. motorhome along pretty well, about 200 horsepower and 400 ft-lbs of torque. The same engine was used in Jeep Cherokees when they were owned by M-B.



“If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.”
--Albert Einstein
  Reply
Share Thread:  


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Had To Share This One Austin Vert 5 842 01-20-2016, 05:33 PM
Last Post: 4Vforever
  Just something to share kindersmach 6 772 11-10-2014, 02:37 PM
Last Post: mdunlap
  have to share this one OMS 6 1,045 04-26-2012, 12:23 PM
Last Post: luxstang



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)