• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
another 71-73 omition...

[Image: 2cossj6.png]
97 F150: wrecked, 96 Dodge 4x4: blown motor / donated to the base
88 Suburban 4x4 355 cid 8 inch lift: sold, 95 Celica 5 speed : sold
68 F750 391 cid : sold,  96 F350 7.3 diesel dually : sold
86 Chevy 1500 305 cid c1500: sold, 73 Mustang mach 1 466 cid 5 speed : under construction
89 F350 4x4 cummins swap : sold, 64 Dodge d600: gone
00 Excursion: traded, 72 Mustang mach 1 302: scrapped
73 Mustang coupe: scrapped, 73 ranchero gt
06 Honda crf 450x : sold, 04 Honda vtx 1800
88 Bronco xlt lariat: sold, 76 Charger: traded
95 F350 4x4: sold , 91 Crown Victoria 302: sold
02 Dakota: traded, 96 f250 powerstroke: parts truck
87 f700, 98 e350 powerstroke: sold
03 land rover: traded, 95 f350 dually: part out
95 f350 dually: traded, 94 f150 4x4: traded
97 f250: sold, 76 Maverick 302: sold
91 240sx rb25: sold, 86 firebird: sold
86 Trans Am: sold, 88 westernstar: sold
89 dodge d350: sold, 2000 Dakota 4x4: sold  
84 f350 3+3: sold, 90 bronco: partout
67 catalina, 64 chevy c60
64 jeep j200, 74 corvette stingray
79 Lincoln mark V, 2013 f350: goldilocks
I can't believe the 429 71 scj isn't on the list!

[Image: Image3.png]
Looks like someone dosen't like our cars again.Dodgy

Sarcastic - Did Ford ever make any Mustangs from 1971 to 1973? Huh


I bet the person who wrote the article drives a blue prius!

[Image: Image3.png]
They listed the Mustang II, but nothing from 71 to 73. I don't know the production numbers but that is just wrong on so many levels...

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

[Image: 1_24_09_13_4_29_06.png]
Even Mustang Monthly gave props to the Boss 351 in there "10 must-have Mustangs" article a few years back. Rolleyes


[Image: mach1sig2.gif]
Mister 4x4;154483 Wrote:Even Mustang Monthly gave props to the Boss 351 in there "10 must-have Mustangs" article a few years back. Rolleyes

Not only that but tests have shown that the Boss 351 engine was most likely the top performing factory small block of the era. But like usual they are just hating on the fat body pony car.
Seriously? The Mustang II? This has to be a sick joke.

-Former 70 & 72 Mustang Owner.
-69 Torino GT, Formal Roof, 351W, Edelbrock 600 cfm, Edelbrock 351W Performer RPM intake, headers, AOD trans, dual flowmasters w/H pipe, Pertronix II Billet, 3.5 TRACLOC g/r, 15" Magnum 500s, 100A alt, aluminum radiator, electric fan, Pro-car seats, mini-starter...owned since Dec 13.
-70 Mach 1, 351W, Edelbrock E-Street EFI, VHX instrument cluster, Hooker headers, dual flowmasters, Pertronix II, 15" Magnum 500s, 150A alt, aluminum radiator, dual electric fans, Pro-car seats, mini-starter
Considering the source of the article, I'm going to keep my opinion to my self. I'm sure the majority of you can figure it out.......

- Travis

I'm an analog man in a digital world.
rutkak;154489 Wrote:Seriously? The Mustang II? This has to be a sick joke.

Actually, the '78 King Cobra was not so bad... the others, not as worthy of the Mustang moniker (much like the 'new' Charger being a 4-door... I'm still irritated by that).

They were OK cars, though - my Mom had a '76 hatch which was about as sporty as it could get without being a 'package' car (Mach 1, Cobra II, etc.)... and it was pretty cool, actually (for what it was).


[Image: mach1sig2.gif]
Share Thread:  

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)