• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
71 vs 72 351c.
#1
I’m sure this has been discussed multiple times over on this board but I’m restoring my 1972 Mach and I’ve been looking at numbers for the motors from 71-72. I know 72 was the start of the emissions crack down but how did they derate the motors from 240 to 177 on the 351 2v? I know the compression was lowered from 9:1 to 8.6:1 but what else? I have a hard time believing that was it. Did they just pull vacuum? Or lie about numbers? Any incite would be golden.
  Reply
#2
The cam timing was also changed.

However, what made the biggest difference was when they changed from brake horsepower rating to SAE net horsepower rating in 1972. Brake horsepower was measured at the crankshaft without any accessories (water pump, alternator, exhaust, etc.) connected, SAE net horsepower is measured at the crankshaft with the accessories attached.



“If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.”
--Albert Einstein
[+] 1 user Likes Don C's post
  Reply
#3
Cam timing in 72 was retarded 4* across the line for most engines. Changing from SAE gross to net was the biggest reason. We all know the pain of the difference between our gross and net take home pay.... :/


[+] 1 user Likes Hemikiller's post
  Reply
#4
(05-28-2018, 09:59 AM)O Hemikiller Wrote: Cam timing in 72 was retarded 4* across the line for most engines. Changing from SAE gross to net was the biggest reason. We all know the pain of the difference between our gross and net take home pay....  :/

So true lol. So with an electronic ignition, 4v carb, and open header on a 72 would it regain me a bit of power? At this point I’m not sure how much I’m gonna be looking at. Keeping the car 90% original aside from the bolt ons.
  Reply
#5
(05-28-2018, 06:56 PM)Capn_Morgan Wrote:
(05-28-2018, 09:59 AM)O Hemikiller Wrote: Cam timing in 72 was retarded 4* across the line for most engines. Changing from SAE gross to net was the biggest reason. We all know the pain of the difference between our gross and net take home pay....  :/

So true lol. So with an electronic ignition, 4v carb, and open header on a 72 would it regain me a bit of power? At this point I’m not sure how much I’m gonna be looking at. Keeping the car 90% original aside from the bolt ons.

A simple 4V carb swap and a set of header with duals is a great way to wake up a 2V engine. I think you'll be very happy with the power increase.


  Reply
Share Thread:  


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  72 351C new heads stock exhaust RichBell 6 176 10-11-2018, 02:00 PM
Last Post: mistercool98
runninpony 351C engine problems egon1107 23 1,314 06-17-2018, 12:06 PM
Last Post: Don C
  351c headers / manifolds Nige 2 346 05-28-2018, 10:06 AM
Last Post: Hemikiller
  351C 2V Build advice ianpala 34 1,832 05-20-2018, 04:12 PM
Last Post: ianpala
  351c block casting # decipher/decode revsitup 3 576 03-05-2018, 10:13 PM
Last Post: revsitup
runninpony 351C Problem with connectiong rods and valves egon1107 9 888 02-23-2018, 04:30 AM
Last Post: NOT A T5
  Holy grail 351c cj ho???? Casperfast 31 3,860 12-26-2017, 10:25 AM
Last Post: Raven
  1973 351C 4V Exhaust Manifolds Steve73QMach1 1 689 12-05-2017, 02:12 PM
Last Post: 73pony



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)