• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
71 M CODE
#1
I'm interested in this.........I've talked to the owner. He gave me his bottom line price if it didn't sell on ebay. Anyone here have any thoughts on the value or the correctness, or any other thought would be appreciated. I'm looking for a clean, 4 spd car that is priced fair.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/273555626856
  Reply
#2
Nice car, presents well, great color combo. A few issues that would make me question his assumption of a high 2 bordering a #1 condition.
Thanks Jay
  Reply
#3
Ya looks like a nice car. Definitely worth seeing it in person. Good luck!

run_horse Run Horse Run!
John 72 Q Code
  Reply
#4
I would call in to question the statement that it's all original sheet metal. It should have hood pins on the hood but doesn't. The catches for the pins are still on the radiator support. Also, should have a rubber front bumper but it's been changed to chrome. I would inspect for front end damage that's been repaired.

Steve
  Reply
#5
If personal inspection confirms clean / correct 'restored' condition as represented and the mechanical's are all good, the price range the owner is asking - Buy it now at $31K - or maybe a few thousand less ($26K - $28K) for a 'best offer' situation seems to be where the market is.

Car has all the goodies and is confirmed with Marti -- sure would be a fun ride.

So keep in mind how many folks out there bought something for $16K - $20K needing some 'minor corrective' work and are currently spending another $15K+ before it's even finished -- not to mention the time invested. This one could be a fair deal.
  Reply
#6
So did all 71 "M" code ram air mach 1's have hood pins ? The owner told me the hood fits close on the passenger fender, and needed adjustment. Also the weather strip where the door meets the hinge area on the drivers side is distorted in the picture. Is that weather stripping a pain to replace?

Again, I want to thank you all for the knowledge you have and the willingness to share it. That's what makes this forum so great.
  Reply
#7
At a quick glance, that looks like my car...…….. I wish!! Very nicely optioned.
I would definitely want to go look at it, tell the seller to shut up and make your own decision on what's right or wrong on the car.
Overall it looks really nice, but I would be prepared for a few 'surprises'
What looks right on the car is easy to see, but what looks wrong as far as I see is; the engine color looks to be too light in the picture, should be Dark Corporate Blue. The underside is in Red Primer, should be slop grey to black with some undercoating.
The chrome bumper definitely is wrong on a Mach 1 and as for the hood, I believe it should have hood locks with the ram air. With out going back to look, was the ram air factory? The brackets are not on the rad support as mentioned in another post. I think the rad holding brackets are what was mistakenly seen and they should be black, not silver color. Those are minor things, but lead to bigger suspicions. Front end damage? Needs very close inspection.
If it were me, I'd likely buy it at 25K if it all check out okay and be prepared to spend more on it to get it just right.
Geoff.

I learn something new every day!
  Reply
#8
it is always hard to tell from photos like this.... but, i think this car needs to be seen in person to confirm it is as the seller states. For some reason, one area sticks out at me: Looking from the rear of the car, the rear 1/4 panel end caps seem a little off to me. There is quite a gap between them and the 1/4 panel, I know there is a small rubber gasket that runs the length of the end cap, but in this picture, the caps don't appear to be tight to the 1/4 panel? Looking at the rear of the car from the passenger side view, again, the end cap seems off in comparison to the trunk lid and there appears to be excessive gap between the trunk lid and the 1/4 panel. Again, this could just be the photos..., that is why I advocate looking at the car in person. I viewed many other smaller tell tail signs that make me wonder about the validity of the seller's claims... Hope it is what he claims. Good luck.
  Reply
#9
(11-18-2018, 09:50 AM)7173Vert Wrote: it is always hard to tell from photos like this.... but, i think this car needs to be seen in person to confirm it is as the seller states. For some reason, one area sticks out at me: Looking from the rear of the car, the rear 1/4 panel end caps seem a little off to me. There is quite a gap between them and the 1/4 panel, I know there is a small rubber gasket that runs the length of the end cap, but in this picture, the caps don't appear to be tight to the 1/4 panel? Looking at the rear of the car from the passenger side view, again, the end cap seems off in comparison to the trunk lid and there appears to be excessive gap between the trunk lid and the 1/4 panel. Again, this could just be the photos..., that is why I advocate looking at the car in person. I viewed many other smaller tell tail signs that make me wonder about the validity of the seller's claims... Hope it is what he claims. Good luck.

 I see what you mean about the extensions. The hood also is way too tight to the fenders, so likely the fenders need adjusting outward, then the hood adjusted.
 Something else I just noticed is the lower control arm was heavily rust pitted before being cleaned up. So what else! Definitely need to be seen and by someone who knows these cars.

I learn something new every day!
  Reply
#10
You guys are really telling SLO-RIDE important things !!   I (we) put a lot into answering questions.  I see he is from PA (rust belt) so my guess is you think any car better than what you usually see is cool !     Looking at this - I actually think that the fact that it wasn't all apart might be better (than some of the so called restored ones for sale).

With any car the buyer will have to get past the items that others wouldn't accept.  (Hood/repro panels mentioned) but also the things like the  unrestored (just painted over) floor, rear and items owner didn't address.    When you see he didn't pony up for an Enduro bumper , you know they are repro.  You know they are repro because of the other items used.  He paid for door panels drew the line on the rear quarters with the speakers.   He left the rear speakers from the old Kenwood system - but put a PHILCO (73) radio in because of cost of a 71 (or didn't know better).

Again - you just have to get past (or fix all the things) they the owner did.  You would go broke doing all (like the later console, quarters, shifter and underside) but could tidy the engine compartment a but free to re route the heater hoses, $2500 for a 4 speed radiator.  

My guess is when you "talked" he pointed out the cost of paint, interior and "things he bought"!   Looks like he built to the marti and is proud of that.

Mark
P.S.  Looking at his profile .... only negatives were for "not as perfect as described" and MISQUE ON TITLE (what ever that meant).   Seems he is a motorcycle guy now a Mustang restorer.
  Reply
Share Thread:  


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  1971 Mach 1 M -code project on E bay classicsguy 10 408 12-09-2018, 11:44 AM
Last Post: Tnfastbk
  Another 72 Mach 1 Q code project on E bay classicsguy 7 298 11-26-2018, 10:59 AM
Last Post: Carolina_Mountain_Mustangs
  1972 Mach 1 Q -code project highly optioned on E bay classicsguy 18 651 11-20-2018, 11:22 AM
Last Post: classicsguy
  1973 Q -code 4 speed vert project on E bay classicsguy 7 285 11-20-2018, 07:51 AM
Last Post: classicsguy
  Friend selling 72 Q code vert Boss1Ray 18 654 11-11-2018, 08:40 AM
Last Post: kevken1959
  72 Q code Mach in Michigan -project Hemikiller 0 194 10-29-2018, 05:51 PM
Last Post: Hemikiller
  71 H code value Newold 27 1,283 08-30-2018, 05:38 AM
Last Post: Newold
  1972 Q code? Sprint Sportsroof in KC classicsguy 6 641 08-18-2018, 01:12 PM
Last Post: Don C



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)