• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
351c cam lobe ID. Have to measure lift
#1
I have the heads off my 351c 4v due to head gasket coolant leak. Took them in to the machine shop to evaluate before reinstall. The guy there is very knowledgible and he asked me to measure the lift on the cam, so he could double check the geometry of the valve train. 

I plan on doing this either in the morning or on Saturday. Starting at the front of the engine, what lobes are intake vs exhaust?

Thanks for all of the help.

Rich
  Reply
#2
The first two on the right bank (passenger side) are intake (1st) and exhaust (2nd). The complete sequence for the right bank is IEIEIEIE (front to rear). The sequence for the left bank (drivers side) is EIEIEIEI.



“If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.”
--Albert Einstein
[+] 1 user Likes Don C's post
  Reply
#3
(07-19-2018, 06:14 PM)Don C Wrote: The first two on the right bank (passenger side)  are intake (1st) and exhaust (2nd). The complete sequence for the right bank is IEIEIEIE (front to rear). The sequence for the left bank (drivers side) is EIEIEIEI.

Thank you
  Reply
#4
I measured cam lift at the lifter. .537 and .545, also installed are comp cams magnum rockers at the ratio of 1.72.. hydraulic cam and guide plates.

351C cc4v heads

Ok engine guys, what problems or observations do you see? Heads are in the machine shop. Ted right away questioned stuff like the valve seals are riding very high on the valve stem. Then additionally he saw the valve springs not snug in the retainers. Which is why he had me measure the cam lift.
  Reply
#5
My first thought is valve recession.

I'm assuming that the lift numbers you gave are the total lift at the valves and not cam lobe?



“If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.”
--Albert Einstein
  Reply
#6
(07-22-2018, 07:52 PM)Don C Wrote: My first thought is valve recession.

I'm assuming that the lift numbers you gave are the total lift at the valves and not cam lobe?

Measured with a dial indicator on the lifter.
  Reply
#7
(07-22-2018, 08:29 PM)Ryunker Wrote:
(07-22-2018, 07:52 PM)Don C Wrote: My first thought is valve recession.

I'm assuming that the lift numbers you gave are the total lift at the valves and not cam lobe?

Measured with a dial indicator on the lifter.

That'll give you .924" and .937" lift at the valve - I don't think that is possible.


  Reply
#8
(07-22-2018, 06:36 PM)Ryunker Wrote: I measured cam lift at the lifter. .537 and .545, also installed are comp cams magnum rockers at the ratio of 1.72.. hydraulic cam and guide plates.

351C cc4v heads

Ok engine guys, what problems or observations do you see?  Heads are in the machine shop. Ted right away questioned stuff like the valve seals are riding very high on the valve stem. Then additionally he saw the valve springs not snug in the retainers. Which is why he had me measure the cam lift.

No way those are numbers at the lifters-it just isn't so-that would translate to a cam with actual lift of .942 which is not possible without heavy, heavy modification.

[Image: 1_01_07_15_8_53_18.png]

"I love my Hookers!" and "Get some Strange" probably have a different connotation to non automotive enthusiasts!
  Reply
#9
(07-23-2018, 12:34 PM)Jeff73Mach1 Wrote:
(07-22-2018, 06:36 PM)Ryunker Wrote: I measured cam lift at the lifter. .537 and .545, also installed are comp cams magnum rockers at the ratio of 1.72.. hydraulic cam and guide plates.

351C cc4v heads

Ok engine guys, what problems or observations do you see?  Heads are in the machine shop. Ted right away questioned stuff like the valve seals are riding very high on the valve stem. Then additionally he saw the valve springs not snug in the retainers. Which is why he had me measure the cam lift.

No way those are numbers at the lifters-it just isn't so-that would translate to a cam with actual lift of .942 which is not possible without heavy, heavy modification.

Yes unreasonable.  Now I have to pull the cam. I will post the actual lift when I get it out.

The valve seals ride directly at the top of them stem. That's what stirred up this mess, along with the leaky head gasket.
  Reply
Share Thread:  


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  351w vs 351c mudbilly 7 323 Today, 01:15 AM
Last Post: Spike Morelli
  Missing on one cylinder - 351C TheDude 68 1,813 04-18-2019, 02:30 PM
Last Post: TheDude
  Prepping 351C Heads Don C 0 177 04-02-2019, 06:19 PM
Last Post: Don C
  351 Cleveland Oil Restrictors – 351C Oiling Fix Boss1Ray 5 323 03-31-2019, 09:35 AM
Last Post: Carolina_Mountain_Mustangs
  351c 2v Cam advice ianpala 25 819 03-31-2019, 07:50 AM
Last Post: TommyK
  Valve cover suggestions for 351C 73' mach 1 18 697 03-07-2019, 01:18 PM
Last Post: rackerm
  PCV Hose 351C turtle5353 14 484 02-28-2019, 11:19 PM
Last Post: Stanglover
  351c starting & driving issues n_reckless 12 517 02-28-2019, 10:42 PM
Last Post: kcmash



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)