• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
351c 2v Cam advice
#11
(03-09-2019, 11:41 PM)ianpala Wrote:
(03-09-2019, 06:42 PM)Mister 4x4 Wrote: I went for a little more oomph and got a CompCams K32-421-8 kit.  Came with hydraulic lifters, lifter 'keeper,' and a timing chain/sprocket set-up, and I added some CompCams 7825-16 Hi-Energy push rods to go with the 17045-16 Hi-Energy die cast aluminum 1.73 roller rockers.  The lifter 'keeper' is necessary for the hydraulic roller lifters to maintain their alignment, and will require drilling and tapping the block in the valley.  

The cam is pretty 'middle of the road,' as in better than stock and not getting into the racing cams range.  After doing some fuzzy math using the CompCams CamQuest utility (plugging in all the other engine mods I did, including headers, intake, carb, etc.), I figure I'm in the 400-ish hp range, and the car runs great!  It's backed up by an AOD and 3.00 rear gears - and has no issues with burn-outs or just putt-putting down the road.

Hope that helps!

Thats a little more lift than I want I think.  What do you think of the Comp Cams Xtreme 32-242-4 Duration 262/270 (218/224 @.050" lift) , Lift .513/.520, 110 lobe separation as a step under? Still trying to figure out if ill need to change springs right away.

To be honest, I have no idea what to think - I didn't know much at all about cams until another member was working out which one he wanted for his car.  I pretty much went the same direction as he did, since his car was a lot like I wanted mine to be, and his videos were all I needed to see (0 to 100 in 6 or 7 seconds, with an automatic and 3.00 rear gears was pretty impressive to me).

I don't know the difference between a symmetrical vs. asymmetrical cam, or the benefits of each.  What I do know is that mine is 274/274 @ .566" (works out to 218/218 @ .050"), and has a very slight chop to the idle.  The throttle response is incredible, and the engine doesn't seem to break a sweat no matter what I do or how I drive it.

http://www.mister4x4.net/cars/Mach_1/Fra...28.mp4?_=1

Eric

[Image: mach1sig2.gif]
[+] 1 user Likes Mister 4x4's post
  Reply
#12
Have you played around with the spreadsheet in this thread? Might give you a little more insight about how variables effect cam selection.
https://www.7173mustangs.com/thread-cams...#pid278395



“If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.”
--Albert Einstein
[+] 1 user Likes Don C's post
  Reply
#13
(03-10-2019, 03:27 PM)Mister 4x4 Wrote:
(03-09-2019, 11:41 PM)ianpala Wrote:
(03-09-2019, 06:42 PM)Mister 4x4 Wrote: I went for a little more oomph and got a CompCams K32-421-8 kit.  Came with hydraulic lifters, lifter 'keeper,' and a timing chain/sprocket set-up, and I added some CompCams 7825-16 Hi-Energy push rods to go with the 17045-16 Hi-Energy die cast aluminum 1.73 roller rockers.  The lifter 'keeper' is necessary for the hydraulic roller lifters to maintain their alignment, and will require drilling and tapping the block in the valley.  

The cam is pretty 'middle of the road,' as in better than stock and not getting into the racing cams range.  After doing some fuzzy math using the CompCams CamQuest utility (plugging in all the other engine mods I did, including headers, intake, carb, etc.), I figure I'm in the 400-ish hp range, and the car runs great!  It's backed up by an AOD and 3.00 rear gears - and has no issues with burn-outs or just putt-putting down the road.

Hope that helps!

Thats a little more lift than I want I think.  What do you think of the Comp Cams Xtreme 32-242-4 Duration 262/270 (218/224 @.050" lift) , Lift .513/.520, 110 lobe separation as a step under? Still trying to figure out if ill need to change springs right away.

To be honest, I have no idea what to think - I didn't know much at all about cams until another member was working out which one he wanted for his car.  I pretty much went the same direction as he did, since his car was a lot like I wanted mine to be, and his videos were all I needed to see (0 to 100 in 6 or 7 seconds, with an automatic and 3.00 rear gears was pretty impressive to me).

I don't know the difference between a symmetrical vs. asymmetrical cam, or the benefits of each.  What I do know is that mine is 274/274 @ .566" (works out to 218/218 @ .050"), and has a very slight chop to the idle.  The throttle response is incredible, and the engine doesn't seem to break a sweat no matter what I do or how I drive it.

http://www.mister4x4.net/cars/Mach_1/Fra...28.mp4?_=1

Turns out the rebuilt heads I bought have some performance springs on them.  They are dual coil and also have a dampener coil.  Can't find a spring rating under 320lbs on summit with these features. This being said I think I should be good to go with more cam than I originally thought. I will just have to upgrade to some hardened push rods.  Hoping not to have to change the length.
  Reply
#14
If you are replacing cam and lifters, why not look at a roller cam. Will cost a little more, but you don’t have to break it in like a flat tappet lifter.
[+] 1 user Likes rcadd1ct's post
  Reply
#15
The 351C 2V heads are very different from the 351C 4V heads. The stock 2V intake port stops gaining flow at about .450 lift where the stock 4V increases in flow until about .600+ lift. The Intake to exhaust flow ratios are very different. The 2V and 4V should be treated as two different engines. The rest of the drive train also needs to be considered when picking a cam, gear ratio, stall speed, exhaust, intended use, desired idle quality, etc.. Given what you said about dual valve springs you need thick wall hardened pushrods, something .080 as a minimum. There is a reason the pushrod bent. You also should research how to obtain proper valve train geometry/pushrod length. When they replaced the lifters did they use a proper break in oil and procedure? The zinc and phosphorous content in current "modern" oils are not sufficient to support the use of flat tappet cams. I suggest you contact someone like Brent Lykins at Lykins Motorsports or Mike Jones Cams for a cam recommendation that will fit the overall build. The extra cost is worth it to obtain the results desired. I hope all goes well with the new cam. Chuck
[+] 2 users Like c9zx's post
  Reply
#16
https://www.diyford.com/ford-351-clevela...alvetrain/

Thanks,
mustang7173 Thankyouyellow

"Courage is being scared to death but saddling up anyway" -- John Wayne
[+] 1 user Likes mustang7173's post
  Reply
Share Thread:  


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Missing on one cylinder - 351C TheDude 19 339 3 hours ago
Last Post: TheDude
  Valve cover suggestions for 351C 73' mach 1 18 583 03-07-2019, 01:18 PM
Last Post: rackerm
  PCV Hose 351C turtle5353 14 395 02-28-2019, 11:19 PM
Last Post: Stanglover
  351c starting & driving issues n_reckless 12 445 02-28-2019, 10:42 PM
Last Post: kcmash
  Is my 351C Distributor 180 out? andy72 14 407 02-28-2019, 11:09 AM
Last Post: Danoh1
  Initial Timing 351C turtle5353 10 324 02-28-2019, 10:08 AM
Last Post: Don C
  351C 4V / C6 auto trans removal advice needed baz70 33 849 02-25-2019, 09:27 AM
Last Post: Bill73Ragtop
  351C 4V - 72 Mach 1 Engine fan baz70 16 513 02-21-2019, 09:13 AM
Last Post: Stanglover



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)