• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1973 Vert
#1
If I was looking I would consider.

So what's wrong with this as my keen eyes aren't the best?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Ford-Mustang-con...1843752847

[/url][Image: mbpsrsig3_zps456db2cb.png]

[url=http://s165.photobucket.com/user/MPBsr25/media/mbpsrsig3_zps456db2cb.png.html]
  Reply
#2
mpbsr;249389 Wrote:If I was looking I would consider.

So what's wrong with this as my keen eyes aren't the best?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Ford-Mustang-con...1843752847

Almost as pretty as the one in your signature picture!
  Reply
#3
Hi Mark,

Just had a real quick look only, and on first glance, the paint out on the hood is not the correct shape as such.

Greg.Smile

whistling LORD, MR FORD - JERRY REED
  Reply
#4
As long as you aren't looking for originality it is a nice car. The convertible top looks fubar'd and there are no pictures of typical rust prone areas so as always caveat emptor.

73 conv. 460, D0VE large valve heads, Performer RPM manifold, Voodoo 227/233 cam, Holley 950 HP carb, C6 trans, 3.25 trak-loc.
  Reply
#5
It's a good looking car. It would have been better if they painted the spoiler black

'Mike'
73 Convertible - 351C/4V CC heads/4bolt/forged flat tops/comp 270/rhodes/mallory unilite/tri-power/hookers/glasspacks/c6/3.50 limited slip/Gear Vendors/Global West sub frames, strut rods and shelby style traction bars/ Rear sway bar/tilt steering (not original)

Pics of modifications included in:
  Reply
#6
Didn't we pick this one apart before? This company depends of bling and shine to sell a car. Pretty much everything on this car is incorrect. Someone said spoiler should be black but if you got argent hood your spoiler was argent I think but not on vert.
I use to fly into visit John Deere and this company would have cars in the airport and they were always done literally half ass.
I sent the owner a long mail on this car and he about blew his top said he had sold so many hundreds of car and they knew what they were doing but they are just a used car lot not a restoration shop.
It even had a galaxie steering wheel on it.
As you know black was not a color for 73 unless it was special order and this car was not so wrong color. The shape of the argent on the hood is just some painters thoughts no were near what it should be. There are parts for 71 and 72 and just stuff laying around they put on and made it shiny. Wrong grill wrong wheels. The top is just pitiful.
It would cost you more to fix what is incorrect on this car than to just buy and original and restore it. Lots of shine and Photoshop work but not a nice car by no means.
When I told him about the forum he said he didn't give a D&%$ about a bunch of computer cowboys talking down his cars. He would sell it to someone and they would be happy. Used car salesman again.
Everyone should make a list of all they see wrong on the car and send him a communication from eBay he might see he is not restoring cars but adding bling.
David


When a man is in the woods and talks and no women are there is he still wrong??
Tongue
David
  Reply
#7
Not a Ram Air car, using stock air cleaner base with a smaller lid, no plenum attached to the hood, looks like they just removed the inserts for the inlets in the hood.
Rear bumper mounts looks to be wrong, possibly has 71/72 ones installed, the gap is too small. The vinyl inserts are missing on the rear body panel that masks the large gap that you see for the bumper ends. Hood accent is wrong shape.
Nice looking car, wonder what they want for it.

-john
(jbojo)
351C 4V cc heads, 10.5 : 1 CR, 290 Herbert cam, Flat top forged pistons, forged connecting rods, Atomic efi,
C6 with Gear Vendor overdrive, 3.89 Tru Trac, Hooker Super Comp with 2 1/2" Pypes Exhaust.        

Some Mod pictures can be seen at:

  Reply
#8
I definitely like the look of the triple black. Maybe the next one...

---
Mike
  Reply
#9
There was a real one on eBay a month ago was a real special order 73 black vert and had not be done was pretty much orig. I think it was only $5,000. I have one but it has the white woven interior.
I have no attachment to it if interested. I have toooo many.
David


When a man is in the woods and talks and no women are there is he still wrong??
Tongue
David
  Reply
Share Thread:  


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  1973 Mustang mpbsr 7 266 03-18-2019, 01:01 PM
Last Post: Carolina_Mountain_Mustangs
  1973 Q-code Mach 1 project -$$$ barn find classicsguy 6 457 02-05-2019, 08:43 PM
Last Post: Tnfastbk
  1972 Q code vert on E bay $55,000.00 classicsguy 22 692 01-22-2019, 09:56 PM
Last Post: kevken1959
  Red 72 Vert in Atlanta Carolina_Mountain_Mustangs 3 251 01-18-2019, 05:52 PM
Last Post: Carolina_Mountain_Mustangs
  1973 Q code Grandé Boss1Ray 1 232 01-03-2019, 03:37 AM
Last Post: JD79
  Is this all a '73 vert worth? Seems cheap. Horsin' Around 7 331 11-20-2018, 06:30 PM
Last Post: TommyK
  1973 Q -code 4 speed vert project on E bay classicsguy 7 395 11-20-2018, 07:51 AM
Last Post: classicsguy
  73 vert in CT -dreamer Hemikiller 1 209 11-17-2018, 11:38 AM
Last Post: rvrtrash



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)