Current time: 12-08-2016, 07:01 PM Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Welcome to 7173Mustangs.com!

You are currently viewing the board as a guest. Please Register or Login for full functionality

If you registered and did not receive your email validation, please send a contact note to the admin by clicking here and filling out the short form.



 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
351C Compression Ratio
Author Message
cobra3073


[Image: TNsuprmod.png]

*
Call Me a Cab

Posts: 2,867
Joined: Jul 2010
Region: South
Memphis, TN
Reputation: 49



Meet and Greet 1 - 4 Air Force Original Owner Mustang Award

    Post: #1
    351C Compression Ratio

    Good Day All,

    I had thought about making a "Fun Question" on this subject but decided to just start a thread on it.

    I have noticed a couple of threads where it has been stated or otherwise inferred that the 4V Clevelands have higher compression ratios than the 2V Clevelands. I think it needs to be stated that this is true under certain circumstances but NOT true under others.

    I am curious as to who among you believe you can identify the circumstances where a 4V Cleveland has a higher compression ratio than a 2V Cleveland (and vice versus) during the 1971 - 1973 time period.

    Lets dialogue.

    BT
    Offline 10-24-2010 05:16 PM
    Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
    Widowmaker00



    *
    "Norm"

    Posts: 959
    Joined: Oct 2010
    Region: Southeast
    North Carolina
    Reputation: 17



    Car of the Month Trophy Meet and Greet 1 - 4 Army

      Post: #2
      RE: 351C Compression Ratio

      1970-71 4v "M" code had higher compression

      1971 4v Boss "R" code had higher comp

      1972 4v "R" code had low comp

      1971-74 4v "Q" code had low comp

      1971-74 2v "H" code had low comp

      The aussie 2v heads had high comp

      The difference is in the cylinder heads, open chamber heads had i believe 76 cc chambers and closed chamber heads had 67 cc chambers.
      (This post was last modified: 10-24-2010 05:39 PM by Widowmaker00.)
      Offline 10-24-2010 05:39 PM
      Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
      cobra3073


      [Image: TNsuprmod.png]

      *
      Call Me a Cab

      Posts: 2,867
      Joined: Jul 2010
      Region: South
      Memphis, TN
      Reputation: 49



      Meet and Greet 1 - 4 Air Force Original Owner Mustang Award

        Post: #3
        RE: 351C Compression Ratio

        Very GOOD start, WIDOWMAKER but I would like to try and focus on the actual compression ratio numbers - - as identified from the Factory.

        For example in 1971, the Boss 351had WW as the compression ratio, the 4V had XX while the 71 2V had YY and so on...

        I think it will be a GREAT learning process for some of us as we compare the differences (AND similarities) over the three year period.

        More comments?

        BT
        Offline 10-24-2010 05:52 PM
        Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
        droptop73


        [Image: MItagJeff.png]

        *
        I'll Lock Up

        Posts: 5,703
        Joined: Jul 2010
        Region: North
        Grand Rapids, MI
        Reputation: 39



        Meet and Greet 10 - 14 Shooter

          Post: #4
          RE: 351C Compression Ratio

          IIRC the closed chamber heads produced a 10.7:1 compression and open chamber heads yielded a 9.4:1 ratio.
          The Boss had an 11+:1 ratio due to a small dome on the pistons, other 71,72 Clevelands used flat top pistons. The 73 used a dished piston with an open chamber head for a 8.7:1 ratio on both the 2v and 4v. The 73 4v heads had the large ports with 2v sized valves.
          Offline 10-24-2010 07:18 PM
          Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
          cobra3073


          [Image: TNsuprmod.png]

          *
          Call Me a Cab

          Posts: 2,867
          Joined: Jul 2010
          Region: South
          Memphis, TN
          Reputation: 49



          Meet and Greet 1 - 4 Air Force Original Owner Mustang Award

            Post: #5
            RE: 351C Compression Ratio

            You are definitely "on to something" Jeff!

            However, I would like to take it just a bit further. What was the actual compression ratios on the 71 and 72 4V and 2V, respectively.

            Both of you obviously know the answer but I want to make it very clear to those who for some reason believe there is a BIG difference between the compression ratios for REGULAR 4V open chamber heads and 2V open chamber heads for a given year as it relates to compression ratio.

            I submit there is a difference in port volumes in the 4V and 2V heads and I believe that is where the confusion is coming from as it relates to the perceived impact on compression ratios.

            BT
            Offline 10-24-2010 07:31 PM
            Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
            Tnfastbk



            *
            I'll Lock Up

            Posts: 7,245
            Joined: Sep 2010
            Region: Southeast

            Reputation: 69



            Car of the Month Trophy Shooter

              Post: #6
              RE: 351C Compression Ratio

              1971 2V 9.0 240HP
              4V 10.7 285HP
              BOSS 11.7 330HP

              NET HP IN 1972
              1972 2V 8.6 161HP
              2V 8.6 164HP
              2V 8.6 177HP
              CJ4V 8.6 248HP
              4V 8.6 262HP
              4V 8.6 266HP
              Offline 10-24-2010 07:55 PM
              Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
              cobra3073


              [Image: TNsuprmod.png]

              *
              Call Me a Cab

              Posts: 2,867
              Joined: Jul 2010
              Region: South
              Memphis, TN
              Reputation: 49



              Meet and Greet 1 - 4 Air Force Original Owner Mustang Award

                Post: #7
                RE: 351C Compression Ratio

                Well done, TNFASTBK!

                To summarize:

                1971 2V has @ 9.0 compression ratio
                4V Has @ 10.7
                BOSS @ 11.7

                1972 2v has @ 8.6 compression ratio
                4V has 8.6
                HO has 8.6

                1973 All has @ 8.0 (uses a slightly different head and piston from 71 and 72)

                The thing to keep in mind is that 1971 (for our scenario) is the only year where the quench (closed) chambered heads were offered. The quench chambered heads had a smaller chamber volumes which made for higher compression ratio when compared with the open chamber heads.

                After 1971, the open chamber heads were used exclusively within the U.S. BOTH the 2V and the 4V had the SAME approximate chamber volume which means they shared the SAME compression ratio.

                Going to open chamber heads when replacing open chamber 2V heads will NOT (in of itself) give you a higher compression ratio. Of course, you could change the pistons to reach that goal (on any of the heads)Smile.

                Hope this helps!

                BT
                Offline 10-24-2010 08:42 PM
                Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
                TommyK



                *
                "Norm"

                Posts: 1,268
                Joined: Sep 2010
                Region: Not Selected
                CT
                Reputation: 40



                Meet and Greet 1 - 4

                  Post: #8
                  RE: 351C Compression Ratio

                  Advertised compression ratios were generally considered inflated.
                  Offline 10-30-2010 01:16 PM
                  Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
                  cobra3073


                  [Image: TNsuprmod.png]

                  *
                  Call Me a Cab

                  Posts: 2,867
                  Joined: Jul 2010
                  Region: South
                  Memphis, TN
                  Reputation: 49



                  Meet and Greet 1 - 4 Air Force Original Owner Mustang Award

                    Post: #9
                    RE: 351C Compression Ratio

                    I can agree with Tommy on his statement relative to advertised compression ratios (and HP) sometimes being inflated.

                    However, that does not detract from the fact that 4V and 2V open chamber Cleveland heads (for a given year) have essentially the SAME compression ratio from the factory.

                    BT
                    Offline 10-30-2010 04:11 PM
                    Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
                    cobra3073


                    [Image: TNsuprmod.png]

                    *
                    Call Me a Cab

                    Posts: 2,867
                    Joined: Jul 2010
                    Region: South
                    Memphis, TN
                    Reputation: 49



                    Meet and Greet 1 - 4 Air Force Original Owner Mustang Award

                      Post: #10
                      RE: 351C Compression Ratio

                      A very good point was brought up on another thread (THANKS again, Totalled) which speaks to often "different" published data as to the clearance volumes and resultant compression ratios of the different 351C engines.

                      Lets discuss "Real World" evidence, specifically I would like to address situations where you may have had your heads cc'd to determine combustion chamber volumes.

                      I will start it off by noting that when I had my original 1973 351CJ heads cc'd, there were variances in the heads which I had the machine shop equalize. Unfortunately, I don't think I have the original "numbers" anymore.

                      Lets dialogue furtherSmile!

                      BT
                      Offline 11-06-2012 08:41 AM
                      Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply



                      Possibly Related Threads...
                      Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
                        Can I figure out my gear ratio from this? cazsper 9 184 12-05-2016 02:18 PM
                      Last Post: Jeff73Mach1
                        351c after run questions waterlife 7 185 11-29-2016 09:20 AM
                      Last Post: c9zx
                        Fuel system. Fuel pump replacement 351C Stanglover 3 195 11-24-2016 03:08 PM
                      Last Post: Stanglover
                        Correct Yoke for 73 Mach 351c 2v FMX Platonic Solid 20 1,653 11-14-2016 06:00 PM
                      Last Post: rafaelmd
                        Carb and intake 4v 351c Carguy4sp 2 217 11-03-2016 10:26 AM
                      Last Post: c9zx
                        351C Hood Clearance w/ Factory Breather & Edelbrock AirGap griffbl 6 308 10-27-2016 06:41 AM
                      Last Post: turtle5353
                        351C Engine Vibration > 2500 RPM The General 36 4,713 10-21-2016 06:44 PM
                      Last Post: The General
                        351C Carburetor Questions kcmash 19 557 10-21-2016 10:41 AM
                      Last Post: kcmash



                      User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)