Current time: 04-20-2014, 01:22 PM Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Welcome to 7173Mustangs.com!

You are currently viewing the board as a guest. Please Register or Login for full functionality

If you registered and did not receive your email validation, please send a contact note to the admin by clicking here and filling out the short form.



 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1971-73 Mach 1 vs 1969-70 Mach 1
Author Message
Mister 4x4


[Image: TXtagEric.png]

Super Moderator

Posts: 2,826
Joined: Aug 2010
Region: Not Selected
San Angelo, Texas
Reputation: 44


  • Air Force
  • Major Contributor
  • Shooter!
  • VIP WFQ Winner
  • Car of the Month
  • Meet and Greet 1 or more
  • Mile + 1
  • A+ Thread
Post: #31
RE: 1971-73 Mach 1 vs 1969-70 Mach 1

(07-08-2013 06:48 AM)MechEng Wrote:  Plus there's a certain pride in saving and restoring a 71-73 because I think people discount them because they aren't the trendy mustang.

I think you might've just coined a new term of endearment for the pre-'71 "Classic" Mustangs. thumb
Offline 07-08-2013 08:58 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Obsidian71



*
Moderator

Posts: 640
Joined: Mar 2011
Region: Northeast
Connecticut
Reputation: 17


  • Bright Idea!
  • A+ Thread
Post: #32
1971-73 Mach 1 vs 1969-70 Mach 1

There have been many times over the years that I have "wished" for an earlier car. When I bought my '71 it was a no brainer. I was 15, and wanted an old Mustang to restore, a friend of a friend had a '71 coupe that he wanted $650 for. It certainly wasn't the quintessential '65 fastback I had always dreamed of, but it was the right deal at the right time and looking back I wouldn't change it for the world! I love my '71, I've also owned an '88 GT and a '00 GT, both very fun cars but not nearly as enjoyable as my '71 (even with the 250 inline 6 it started life with) You can keep those 'trendy Mustangs' all day long, and I'll keep my '71! Unless my wife decides she wants an old Mustang (unlikely) then she'll get an earlier model. Smile
Offline 07-08-2013 06:45 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Stangace20



*
Member

Posts: 247
Joined: Aug 2012
Region: Southwest
San Diego CA
Reputation: 1


  • Car of the Month
  • Meet and Greet 10 or more
Post: #33
RE: 1971-73 Mach 1 vs 1969-70 Mach 1

I would say I like the look of the running lights in the grill (especially on the 71-72) and also the fact they're cheaper to buy than 69-70 mach 1 (which are ridiculously expensive) but at the same time they're a bit more interesting/special than a 69-70 mach 1/mustang. (as w/ all 71-73's vs 60's stangs)
(This post was last modified: 07-09-2013 03:16 PM by Stangace20.)
Offline 07-09-2013 03:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
luxstang



*
Premium Member

Posts: 3,027
Joined: Dec 2010
Region: Europe
Luxembourg / Europe
Reputation: 29


  • Weekly Fun Question Winner
  • Car of the Month
  • A+ Thread
  • Musician Badge
  • Hello International
Post: #34
RE: 1971-73 Mach 1 vs 1969-70 Mach 1

I absolutely love the 69 Fastback. To me it's the coolest and most beautiful Mustang ever. Sporty, sleek, plenty of muscle.
I'd take one over any 67-68 Fastback anytime.
The 65-68 are nice too, but way too mainstream for me. Not that I'd pass one up if I got it cheap but I would never go looking for one.
Now the 71-73 is a completely different matter. I love those cars for their looks and performance but I don't necessarily see them in comparison with the older Mustangs. They are more like their own league.
Offline 07-10-2013 03:30 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Totalled



*
That Ford Guy

Posts: 1,134
Joined: Sep 2011
Region: Northwest
Olympia,Wa
Reputation: 32


  • Shooter!
  • Meet and Greet 1 or more
  • Public Service
Post: #35
RE: 1971-73 Mach 1 vs 1969-70 Mach 1

Yes. I see the 69/70 as the most aggressive looking mustangs. I see the 71-73 as fords muscle car.
Offline 07-10-2013 07:06 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
will e



*
Premium Member

Posts: 1,602
Joined: May 2011
Region: Not Selected
Phoenix
Reputation: 22


  • Weekly Fun Question Winner
  • VIP WFQ Winner
Post: #36
RE: 1971-73 Mach 1 vs 1969-70 Mach 1

I love the 69/70 Mach I. Really cool dash layout. Great looking car.

I have never driven or worked on one so I can't comment on that.
Offline 07-10-2013 07:37 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MechEng



*
Premium Member

Posts: 715
Joined: May 2013
Region: Southwest
California
Reputation: 13


  • Air Force
  • Shooter!
Post: #37
RE: 1971-73 Mach 1 vs 1969-70 Mach 1

I forgot to mention one of my driving factors for why I went to the 73 instead of the 70. I actually fit in a 73, the 70 Fastback that I sat in, even with the seat all the way back, I still felt cramped. In the 73 legs feel good, headroom might be an issue (I don't have a headliner at the moment) but I can slouch!
Offline 07-10-2013 09:23 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kit Sullivan



*
Premium Member

Posts: 664
Joined: Jun 2013
Region: Southeast
Cocoa Beach, Fl USA
Reputation: 14


  • Outstanding Written Work
  • Original Owner
Post: #38
RE: 1971-73 Mach 1 vs 1969-70 Mach 1

"The aircraft carrier" and "the Clydesdale" are derogatory nicknames given to the car by Larry Shinoda during the early development stages of the 71 car. The car was purposely designed wider, longer and heavier to easily accommodate the then-new 385-series engines(429-460). There were even plans to eventually install a 501 cubic inch "Cobra Jet".
The car featured many GM-inspired design features at the behest of Bunkie Knudsen that made the model and indeed the entire program very unpopular with the long-timers at Ford.
Notice that in no place on the interior or exterior of the car did the stylists include the word "Ford" in any styling or nomenclature badges or decals, other than generic parts used on other car lines.
This was the stylist's subversive attempt to declare that the new Mustang was not a "real" Ford product.
The fact that the car is 6" longer and 600 lbs heavier than the 65 model is repeated all the time the show how much the car had grown.
However, it is only 1" longer and about 100 lbs heavier than a 70, yet not many ever complain about how much bigger and heavier the 69-70 models are than the 65s.
The nicknames stuck, and history now views the 71-73s as too big and heavy, and outdated. They just never achieved the popularity of the earlier cars.
That's ok with me...I usually have the only 71-73 car at a show, and that is just fine with me.
Online 07-10-2013 11:12 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
hyena429



*
Premium Member

Posts: 3,104
Joined: Apr 2011
Region: Not Selected
wa
Reputation: 22


  • Shooter!
  • Weekly Fun Question Winner
  • VIP WFQ Winner
  • Car of the Month
  • Meet and Greet 1 or more
  • Musician Badge
Post: #39
RE: 1971-73 Mach 1 vs 1969-70 Mach 1

(07-10-2013 09:23 AM)MechEng Wrote:  I forgot to mention one of my driving factors for why I went to the 73 instead of the 70. I actually fit in a 73, the 70 Fastback that I sat in, even with the seat all the way back, I still felt cramped. In the 73 legs feel good, headroom might be an issue (I don't have a headliner at the moment) but I can slouch!

Mine still has the headliner in it..And i fit fine...I could even wear a baseball cap with out rubbing the linner too much...Im 6'5" tall and ex defencive tackle in high school football....And same as you..Was worried about leg and head room...If you are much taller than me you mite have a issue.
Offline 07-10-2013 11:22 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Machman



*
Senior Member

Posts: 513
Joined: Dec 2011
Region:
NY
Reputation: 6


  • Weekly Fun Question Winner
Post: #40
RE: 1971-73 Mach 1 vs 1969-70 Mach 1

It would have to be the sleek styling of the 71s-73s, they always looked fast even in the driveway.

My first car was a 69 Mach w/ 351 and I guess if I can only have one car for nostalgia reasons it would be that one

(but that being said) even back then while tearing up the roads in the 69 I dreamed of getting a 71 for me they were the coolestthumb
Offline 07-10-2013 01:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
exclamation 1972 Mach 1 351 CJ with C6 Trans mustang7173 4 128 04-17-2014 05:46 AM
Last Post: mustang7173
  Marti break down for my Mach 1 Luke 13 285 04-11-2014 12:28 PM
Last Post: mach71351c
  Seen around Seattle: the Mystery Mach 1 Flatback72 8 271 04-01-2014 10:16 AM
Last Post: Jim and Jutta
  GOLD Plated Mach 1 part 73 CJ 6 280 03-30-2014 10:01 AM
Last Post: Mikes73
  1969 Shelby GT-500 8500 mile garage find Boss1Ray 7 258 03-27-2014 12:09 PM
Last Post: Boss1Ray



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)